Condoleezza Rice Proves Integration Can Provoke Disintegration

As George W Bush’s Nationwide Safety Advisor and subsequently Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice was a distinguished face within the information twenty years in the past. Younger, black, feminine, enticing and single, she stood out within the pale crowd, giving a type of offbeat credibility to a group of growing older institution white males.

Rice disappeared from the information cycle when a younger, enticing black male, Barack Obama, who was additionally a superb rhetorician, triumphantly changed the Bush administration.  Obama displayed a star energy not even Rice might compete with at a second in historical past when the voters wished to dismiss from reminiscence all the pieces related to the Bush years.

In distinction with Obama’s Kenyan heritage, Rice’s ancestors had been slaves liberated by Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. Jim Crow, the brutal apartheid-style system that changed slavery, lasted 100 years. Compelled to behave by a well-organized, non-violent civil rights motion, President Lyndon Johnson pushed by way of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This monumental laws demonstrated the willingness of a majority of white politicians to entertain the concept that blacks deserved the identical respect earlier than the regulation as “regular People,” outlined on the time, within the dominant cultural mindset, as White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs). Right this moment, Fox Information host Tucker Carlson refers to them as legacy People.

Born a 12 months earlier than the fateful day that noticed Rosa Parks refuse to obey a Montgomery, Alabama bus driver’s order to surrender her seat to a white individual, Condoleezza Rice grew up throughout a momentous interval of historical past for black People. The incident within the bus set off a decade of rising protests that led to the laws of 1964, but in addition – simply to show that nothing had actually modified – to Martin Luther King’s assassination in 1968.

The World This Week: Dallas Shines Mild on America’s Darkish Soul


In 1982, on the age of 28, Rice underwent a political conversion. She deserted the Democratic celebration that had so vehemently pushed by way of the civil rights laws beneath Johnson. She joined the Republican celebration that had already change into the brand new residence of conventional Southern racists. Rice claims her resolution was influenced by her father, who by no means forgave the Jim Crow Democrats for stopping him from registering to vote. Had the younger girl failed to note the unconventional swap within the racial politics of the 2 events? In any case, she clearly felt at residence within the Republican celebration.

See also  What You Have to Know Concerning the US Presidency

In 1963, Birmingham, Alabama sealed its place in US historical past books when 4 black women, one in all them a classmate of younger Condoleezza, died within the KKK bombing of a Baptist church. This could have taught the Birmingham native  one thing about segregation and racism and the pressing must overturn just a few nasty cultural habits and perhaps even some establishments. However she already lived in a special world. On the age of three, she was studying French, determine skating and practising ballet in Alabama. As a young person she attended an unique Catholic faculty in Denver, Colorado. Throughout this era, her father disparaged the civil rights motion, whose leaders he known as “uneducated” and “misguided.”

Rising up as a black child, first within the deep South after which within the genteel North, Rice ought to have acquired a way of historical past allowing her to note, in at the moment’s world, after the occasions surrounding George Floyd’s demise in 2020, to what extent the motion in the direction of integration inaugurated by the Civil Rights motion has failed. That’s the reason it sounds shocking to listen to her arise at the moment to defend her political class’s contribution to a special try at integration, one which implicates all current presidents of the US and has come to the fore within the guise of a worldwide disaster.

Talking final week on the Aspen Safety Discussion board, Rice stated, “I’ll exit on a limb right here and say that I feel everyone from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration, to the Obama administration, to the Trump administration did all the pieces potential to attempt to combine Russia into the worldwide system.”

Right this moment’s Weekly Satan’s Dictionary definition:


Apply measures supposed to make a minority conform to the expectations of a dominant majority and finally be judged by its inevitable failure to observe the bulk’s cultural dictates.

Contextual notice

Rice’s rhetorical willingness to “exit on a limb” indicators how uncertain she is of her historic footing right here. She could also be unconsciously conscious, on the idea of the historical past of her personal folks, that doing “all the pieces potential to combine” a bunch of individuals right into a “system” is a course of fraught with risks. The extra one insists on conformity to pre-established ideas as an alternative of the necessity to mutually adapt to a brand new, extra complicated actuality, the extra seemingly integration will fail. The rebellion provoked by George Floyd’s homicide by the hands of a white policeman two years in the past demonstrates that, aside from within the realms of sports activities and leisure, racial integration has remained a chimera within the US.

See also  What Is Driving Somalia’s Political Disaster?

However Rice’s evocation at the moment of integration has nothing to do with the connection between blacks and whites. It issues a nation whose identification formally modified in 1991 from the Soviet Empire to the Russian Federation. Rice is now involved with defending the dignity of her clan, the presidents and administrations from each events who’ve clearly misunderstood and consequently mismanaged their makes an attempt at integrating the remnants of the Soviet Union into the American world monetary, financial and army empire.

Making Sense of Vladimir Putin’s Lengthy Sport


The established political class in Washington feels it needed always to disclaim any duty for its position in an apparent historic mess. Even if the Invoice Clinton administration might, at one level, proudly boast about its profitable meddling within the 1996 Russian election. The article that cites Rice’s declarations in Aspen additionally quotes Clinton, the president who oversaw a chaotic marketing campaign by American politicians, economists and consultants to “modernize” and thereby combine the Russian economic system into the dollar-based world economic system beneath US steering. That effort included discovering intelligent methods to dismiss the protest of an inebriated Boris Yeltsin in regards to the hazard of increasing NATO eastward.

Historic notice

Wanting again at historical past, Invoice Clinton now dogmatically insists: “It isn’t true that we did something to isolate, humiliate or ignore Putin. That’s the most important load of bull you’ll ever hear.” This is identical skilled lawyer who denied having sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky on the grounds, that it “all relies on what the that means of the phrase ‘is’ is.”

Clinton is technically appropriate when he claims that he did nothing to “humiliate or ignore Putin,” who solely emerged as a pacesetter within the last 18 months of Clinton’s second time period. Clinton humiliated and ignored Russia by cleverly exploiting Boris Yeltsin’s alcoholism. He accelerated insurance policies initiated beneath George H.W. Bush that had been designed to show Russia right into a docile annex of a type of North Atlantic confederacy ruled by Washington and its vaunted “rules-based order.” That order rested on common acceptance of the domination of the greenback as the worldwide reserve forex and its corollary, the petrodollar, imposed on OPEC with which Russia collaborates even when it isn’t a member. And the entire deal was sealed by the formal construction of NATO that implicitly forged all European nations as feudal dependencies of Washington.

Recounting his time in Moscow, William J Burns, Clinton’s ambassador to Russia and at the moment the director of the CIA, described “the tangled and repetitive story of publish–Chilly Struggle relations between the 2 nations, wherein troubles had been by no means precisely foreordained, however recurred with miserable regularity.” When troubles recur with miserable regularity, in some unspecified time in the future a smart diplomat or policymaker is more likely to resolve to do one thing slightly than permit them to repeat endlessly. Subsequently, Burns dutifully cabled Washington to tell the Clinton administration of the “acute sense that the West is benefiting from Russia’s weak point.”

See also  The US Army is Profitable. No, Actually, It Is!

No – Not simply Russian Imperialism Has Triggered Struggle in Ukraine


That was 1 / 4 of a century in the past. Within the meantime, NATO saved increasing. In 2008, Burns despatched this message to none aside from Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice: “Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all redlines for the Russian elite (not simply Putin).” Simply as Rice’s ballet courses and her curiosity in classical piano – slightly than say, John Coltrane’s Alabama – might have helped her neglect about her murdered classmate in Birmingham, she appears now to have forgotten that what Burns wrote to her in 2008 actually described a failure to do “all the pieces potential to attempt to combine Russia into the worldwide system.”

In 2006, expressing her opposition to a ceasefire on Israel’s assaults on Lebanon, Rice described the rising dysfunction provoked by the Bush administration’s insurance policies within the area because the “start pangs of a brand new Center East.” The being pregnant lasted one other 15 years, formally ending with President Joe Biden’s withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan final 12 months. Does she acknowledge now that the kid was stillborn?

Curiously, in her protection of previous administrations, Rice cited 4 of the newest American presidents: Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump. She failed to say the present president, Biden. Does that imply she blames him alone? Is he the one, in her thoughts, who has intentionally remodeled integration into what’s wanting more and more like disintegration of the vaunted rules-based order?

*[In the age of Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain, another American wit, the journalist Ambrose Bierce produced a series of satirical definitions of commonly used terms, throwing light on their hidden meanings in real discourse. Bierce eventually collected and published them as a book, The Devil’s Dictionary, in 1911. We have shamelessly appropriated his title in the interest of continuing his wholesome pedagogical effort to enlighten generations of readers of the news. Read more of Fair Observer Devil’s Dictionary.]

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Truthful Observer’s editorial coverage.